Research and Reference Articles
- Françoys Gagné DMGT
- The Betts-Neihart Profiles of Gifted Students
- SENG Supporting the Emotional Needs of the Gifted, Featured Articles
- The Theory of Positive Disintegration - Dabrowski
- Is It a Cheetah? - Stephanie Tolan
- How Do I Know if My Child has Gifts or Talents?
- Characteristics of Young Gifted Children
- Characteristics of Gifted Children and Talented Children and Possible Associated Problems
- IQ Testing or Assessment of Gifted Children - Marion Mackenzie
- Early Entry to Prep - Gail Young (Mindscape article January 2018)
- What to look for in a school for your Gifted child. (Anthony Stevens)
- IQ Test_How to mine the data and avoid the pitfalls (Hoyte and Haines)
- Precocious preschooler_Positive Parent (Mindscape Jan 2019)
- GLD article by Carol Barnes (extracted from Mindscape Issue 1 2022)
Link to Articles with references pre-2000.
Here’s a comparative analysis of Gagné’s Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT) alongside other influential gifted education models:
1. Gagné’s DMGT
- Core Idea: Distinguishes giftedness (natural abilities) from talent (systematically developed skills).
- Structure:
- Natural Abilities: Intellectual, creative, socioaffective, sensorimotor.
- Developmental Process: Learning and practice transform gifts into talents.
- Catalysts: Intrapersonal (motivation, personality), Environmental (family, school), and Chance.
- Strengths:
- Offers a developmental perspective, emphasizing dynamic interaction between nature and nurture.
- Recognizes underachievement and contextual influences.
- Limitations:
- Less prescriptive for classroom strategies compared to enrichment-based models. [australian...upport.com], [api.pageplace.de], [psycnet.apa.org]
2. Renzulli’s Three-Ring Conception
- Core Idea: Giftedness arises from the interaction of:
- Above-Average Ability
- Creativity
- Task Commitment
- Focus: Promotes creative productivity rather than static ability.
- Strengths:
- Encourages behavioral traits like persistence and creativity.
- Practical application through Schoolwide Enrichment Model (SEM).
- Limitations:
- Less emphasis on innate ability; critics argue it may overlook highly able but unmotivated learners. [files.eric.ed.gov], [gifted.uconn.edu], [researchgate.net]
3. Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
- Core Idea: Intelligence is plural, encompassing linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic domains.
- Strengths:
- Broadens identification beyond traditional IQ.
- Supports differentiated instruction in diverse classrooms.
- Limitations:
- Criticized for lack of empirical validation and difficulty in operationalizing for gifted programs. [files.eric.ed.gov], [numberanalytics.com]
Key Differences
Aspect | DMGT | Renzulli | Gardner |
|---|---|---|---|
Definition | Giftedness = potential; Talent = achievement | Giftedness = ability + creativity + commitment | Giftedness = multiple intelligences |
Developmental Lens | Strong (focus on transformation) | Moderate (focus on behaviours) | Weak (focus on domains) |
Catalysts | Intrapersonal, environmental, chance | Motivation and creativity emphasized | Contextual, cultural influences |
Educational Use | Policy frameworks, identification | Enrichment programs | Curriculum differentiation |